Need help! I’m facing a daunting challenge that revolves around managing scope of my eLearning projects: accommodating frequent content additions. It appears that stakeholders frequently ask for new content to be added, which causes the project scope to increase beyond what was originally agreed. I’m interested in hearing your insightful opinions as I work to maintain project timeframes and provide a targeted learning experience. What strategies have you used to control frequent scope changes when it comes to adding content to eLearning projects?
Learned my lesson about such random scope changes and now I’m on it! Created a fancy change request form for stakeholders to spill their content dreams, but only after a thorough interrogation. It helps me decide if their ideas fit the scope, time, and resources.
Hi! This is what I follow. I thoroughly analyze the scope during the initial project planning phase. By involving stakeholders in defining and prioritizing content requirements upfront, we can identify potential scope change triggers and establish a shared understanding of project boundaries. This proactive approach helps me mitigate scope creep risks and deliver focused eLearning solutions.
Hi! I use a change management tool that allows stakeholders to submit content addition requests, which are then evaluated against defined project scope and objectives. This tool helps me track and manage content changes effectively, ensuring that only justified and high-impact additions are considered while keeping scope change instances under control.
I usually draft a scope of work document or a statement of work requiring my stakeholders to sign off on. This way, when I get requests to put more content into the course, I can remind them that this content is out of this project’s scope.
Also, training should always be about what the employee is expected to do. If adding this material is merely nice to know or strictly knowledge-based, respond with “How does this material help the employee do their job?” Sometimes, adding the material is warranted, but adding a Wikipedia page about the topic often doesn’t help employees perform the tasks they need.
You must be logged in to post a comment.